The Mis-Education of Nolaboy

"Allow me the freedom to grow outside of the physical constraints of THE BOX" Give me freedom or give me death, That is all I ask... Being the prototypical "Tragic Artist" type, my abused mental state can't bare to be restrained by society as a whole and thier idiotic, insanely small view of what is exspected of a so-called "normal" individual. The grain is what I've primarily gone against time after time, I absolutely believe in the abstract concept called Exspression .... Without that basic civil liberty I honestly would lose the will to live in this bleek, boring, hopelessly bewildered world. Action is living life to the fullest, and being resposible in your actions... not just selfishly fullfilling your own personal needs. But giving of yourself to the community as a whole. Some where between those two extremes I exsist ..... Quietly, peacefully in harmony with my ego & earth, my desire & society, my person & humanity. I AM REVOLUTION, in essence ... In contrary to popular opinion, I choose to spend not most of, but all of my time outside of the box, where all the hip kids are. I admit to my mis-eduation, now I hope to re-educate myself and if at all possible maybe even you ........

2) White privilege conditions white people not to see white rage. However, it makes them hyper-aware of Black threat. Newt Gingrich is white rage personified. And for it, he gets loads of applause. So is Jan Brewer, but usually we think of white rage in masculine terms. Gender stereotypes condition us not to see white women as being capable of this kind of dangerous emotional output. We reserve our notions of female anger for Black women. Such hidden race-gender logics allow Brewer to assert that she “felt threatened,” even though she was trying to handle the situation “with grace.” Now look back at the picture: who is threatening whom? Couple white rage with white women’s access to the protections that have been afforded to their gender, and you have something that looks ironically like white female privilege. Yes (yes, yes), the discourse of protection is based upon problematic and sexist stereotypes of white women as dainty and unable to care for themselves, and yes, these stereotypes have caused white women to be oppressed by white men. But remember, gender does not exist in a racial vacuum. It is performed in highly racialized contexts, and history proves that what constitutes oppression for white women in relation to white men, dually constitutes privilege for white women in relation to Black men. (I’m not spoiling for a fight today, so anybody who feels uncomfortable with such assertions should probably go read some Patricia Hill Collins, Black Sexual Politics and then try again.) What I know is this: 100 years ago (less than, actually) a Black man even standing that close to a white woman would’ve gotten him lynched. (Seriously, I just discovered that even accommodationist Booker T. Washington was beaten in New York in 1911 for talking to a white woman.) And I know that if a Black woman had wagged her finger at Bush II or even Bill Clinton, we would have seen her faced down, handcuffed, with Secret Service swarming. When your race and gender grant you opportunities to be treated with dignities that others don’t have or conversely, to heap indignities on those people, that is what we call privilege. Deal with it.


3) Unchecked white rage has always been dangerous for Brown and Black folk in America. Jan Brewer’s Arizona is not safe for Brown people and by implication, not safe for Black people (Presidents included). Not only has she terrorized and racially profiled immigrant communities, but she has gutted one of the model Ethnic Studies programs for high school students in this country. If there were ever a time for Black and Brown solidarity, it is now. And hell, lest we forget, Arizona is not even safe for white women. It is the vitriolic racial climate that Brewer’s anti-immigrant, anti-Latino policies have helped to foment that led to the violence against Gabby Giffords.

Crunktastic, White Women’s Rage: 5 Thoughts On Why Jan Brewer Should Keep Her Fingers to Herself, Crunk Feminist Collective 1/27/12 (via racialicious)

FUCK YES!

(via radseed)

(via radseed)

quantumchaology:

We’re spinning about 1,040 mph and going around our sun 18.5 miles per second and you’re not amazed by this?!?! Open your mind.

quantumchaology:

We’re spinning about 1,040 mph and going around our sun 18.5 miles per second and you’re not amazed by this?!?! Open your mind.

(via jheneaiko)

salunltd:

“You see, I’m trapped in my mind and I’m going trippy”

salunltd:

“You see, I’m trapped in my mind and I’m going trippy”


(via mindbodyme)

pantslessprogressive:

“To those who seek to avoid action by their National Government in their home communities—who want to and who seek to maintain purely local control over elections—the answer is simple. Open your polling places to all your people. Allow men and women to register and vote whatever the color of their skin. Extend the rights of citizenship to every citizen of this land. There is no constitutional issue here. The command of the Constitution is plain. There is no moral issue. It is wrong—deadly wrong—to deny any of your fellow Americans the right to vote in this country. There is no issue of States rights or National rights. There is only the struggle for human rights.” - Lyndon B. Johnson (August 27, 1908 – January 22, 1973), Voting Rights Act Address, 1965.
[Photo: President Johnson discusses the Voting Rights Act with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Credit: Hulton Archive/Getty Images]

pantslessprogressive:

“To those who seek to avoid action by their National Government in their home communities—who want to and who seek to maintain purely local control over elections—the answer is simple. Open your polling places to all your people. Allow men and women to register and vote whatever the color of their skin. Extend the rights of citizenship to every citizen of this land. There is no constitutional issue here. The command of the Constitution is plain. There is no moral issue. It is wrong—deadly wrong—to deny any of your fellow Americans the right to vote in this country. There is no issue of States rights or National rights. There is only the struggle for human rights.” - Lyndon B. Johnson (August 27, 1908 – January 22, 1973), Voting Rights Act Address, 1965.

[Photo: President Johnson discusses the Voting Rights Act with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Credit: Hulton Archive/Getty Images]

(Source: pantslessprogressive)